Sunday, 13 October 2013

Exemplifying APA Writing Conventions




Analysing APA(American Psychological Association, 2010) Sixth Edition Academic Writing Style

            Academic writing leads writers to explore and perfect their writing skills for academic purposes by establishing a set of language conventions and writing requirements to be met. In this paper, APA (American Psychological Association, 2010) Academic writing system in its sixth edition is analysed as it appears in an article by Dalvit, Murray, Terzoli, Zhao, & Mini (2005). Issues such as citations, signal phrases and the reference list are examined to finally decide whether they are correctly applied or not. The authors' possible purpose of using these techniques is also examined along the paper.
One of the techniques mostly used by the authors is paraphrased in-text citations through which other writers' work or study are cited. Observing the following example clarifies the use if this mechanism: “As far as language problems are concerned, the current approach to foundation programmes in South Africa is mainly informed by studies in the Humanities (Boughey, 2002 as cited in Dalvit, et al., 2005, p.73)”.  It could be assumed that the authors intend to provide support to the information being presented and to make it more credible in consequence (Purdue Owl, 2006), without textually transcribing words.
            In addition, in-text citations alluding to institutions or groups are much used in this article as well, since the authors appear to be purposefully making reference, for example, to government institutions and programmes. Considering the importance of the topic they are developing, including these references might serve to show its relevance and these institutions' actions in the field. The following sentence provides an example: “In trying to solve this problem, the South African Government has recently encouraged traditionally ‛White’ institutions to increase the possibilities of access to tertiary education for African students” (Council on Higher Education, 2001 as cited in Dalvit, et al., 2005, p.73).  
            A third type of paraphrased in- text citation involves the use of signal phrases, which operate as “signals or alerts” to introduce other writers' ideas. Sentences such as the next one prove a clear example: “According to Heugh (2000)…” (as cited in Dalvit, et al., 2005, p.72). On some other occasions, the authors introduce works and research studies, assumingly to provide factual information such as statistics or averages. This could be seen in the next sentence “Preliminary investigation shows that speakers…”  (as cited in Dalvit, et al., 2005, p.73).  
            As regards the reference list, the authors have organized the references in alphabetical order. They have not failed to present references to book sources as well as online sources, including the relevant information in the order and case established by APA (2010) system. However, the authors do not seem to have respected the capitalization of only the initial letter of titles of works since all content words appear capitalized.
Having examined the writing style in this article, it is possible to conclude that the authors have, in general terms, respected the requirements established by the APA(2010) system. Additionally, the quotations have not been overused as they do not seem to represent more than 10% of the complete work. As a result of that, the authors appear to have succeeded in limiting the amount of exact transcription of source materials (Lester, 1976, p.46-47 as cited in Purdue OWL, 2010) and used the quotations as supporting, contributive material instead.




References
Dalvit, L., Murray, S., Terzoli, A., Zhao X., Mini B.  (2005). Providing increased access to English L2 students of computer science at a South African University. US-China Education Review, Sep. 
Purdue  OWL (2006). Quotating, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Retrieved November 2007, from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/563/01/
Purdue OWL. (2010). Paraphrase: Write it in your own words. Retrieved from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/2005, Vol. 2 (9).

Discourse Communities through the eyes of Swales (1990)




Describing Discourse Communities following Swales' (1990) criteria

            Swales (1990) establishes some criteria to define the requirements that communities must fulfill to be considered as discourse communities. According to this criteria, one of the characteristics that discourse communities have is common goals and specific interests towards which they work cooperatively. “The community college can be seen as a discourse community [because] its members have, over time, developed a common discourse that involves shared knowledge, common purposes, common relationships, and similar attitudes and values, shared understandings about how to communicate their knowledge and achieve their shared purposes” (Kutz, 1997 as cited in Kelly- Kleese, 2001, para. 4).
Kutz's understanding of a discourse community also provides evidence of the number of aspects these communities have in common besides the final goal. Kutz (1997) adds that “discourse communities [also] share a flow of discourse that has a particular structure and style” (para.4). Kutz's view introduces a second requirement following Swales' (1990) criteria: Community-specific genres. In reference to this, Hoffman-Kipp, Artiles, & Lopez-Torres (2003) speak of a “social language” that these communities acquire and that might be defined as “a discourse peculiar to a specific [societal group—eg. professional or ethnic group] at a given time” (Holquist & Emerson, 1991, cited in Hoffman- Kipp, et al., 2003, para. 26) that “reveal the values and beliefs of the social group in which they are participating” (Hoffman-Kipp, et al., 2003, para. 26).
Swales (1990) additionally sustains that these communities also have “participatory mechanisms” that serve the purpose of communication channels for its members towards the construction of knowledge since “interaction with the people in one's environment are major determinants of both what is learned and how learning takes place” (Wenzlaff & Wieseman, 2004, para. 4). The authors add that “the community, too, changes through the ideas and ways of thinking that its new members bring to the discourse” (Putnam & Borko, 2000, as cited in Wenzlaff & Wieseman, 2004, para. 4).
Participatory mechanisms take place alongside with what Swales (1990) considers to be another requirement: “information exchange”. In this regard, Porter (1992) speaks of “fuzzy boundaries” between communities, which implies that “discourse communities cannot be isolated from other discourse communities” (as cited in Kelly- Kleese, 2001, para. 7).
John – Steiner and –Mahn (1996) asserts teachers utilize in their work cognitive mechanisms such as the use of scientific concepts (Hoffman- Kipp, et al., 2003), of theories of learning and pedagogy among others (Hoffman- Kipp, et al., 2003). As exemplified here, Swales (1990) includes “highly specialized terminology” as another characteristic since a community, following his criteria, should make use of specific words, abbreviations and acronyms to define concepts as it advances in the development of knowledge.
            A number of requirements that discourse communities should meet to be considered as such has been discussed and supported with evidence from different articles following Swales' (1990) criteria to define discourse communities.


References
Hoffman- Kipp; Artiles, A; & Lopez- Torres, L. (2003). Beyond reflection: teacher learning as praxis. Theory into Practice. Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NQM/is_3_42/ai_108442653 
Kelly- Kleese, C. (2001). Editor's choice: an open memo to community college faculty and administrators. Community College Review. Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_29/ai_77481463
Kelly- Kleese, C. (2004). UCLA community college review: community college scholarship and discourse. Community College Review. Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_32/ai_n6361541
Wenzlaff, T; & Wieseman, K. (2004). Teachers need teachers to grow. Teacher Education Quarterly. Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3960/is_200404/ai_n9349405